Critical Infrastructure (CI) Series, Post 2: The Evolving Threat Landscape for CI
Unpacking the Evolving Cyber Threats to Critical Infrastructure: From IT/OT Convergence to State-Sponsored Attacks
Intended Audience: Beginner, general public.
Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure happen every second, and their complexity continues to rise. Today’s interconnected technologies have created new vulnerabilities that cybercriminals and even state-sponsored actors are eager to exploit. This post will explore how the threat landscape is shifting, why critical infrastructure sectors are increasingly at risk, and what must be done to protect these vital systems.
How the Threat Landscape is Changing
In the past, critical infrastructure systems operated in isolation, making them less vulnerable to outside interference. However, with advancements in technology and the integration of Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT), these systems have become increasingly interconnected. The result? A much broader attack surface that adversaries can exploit.
Industry 4.0 and IT/OT Convergence
The rise of Industry 4.0 technologies—such as the Internet of Things (IoT), automation, and big data—has revolutionized how critical infrastructure operates. IT and OT systems are now working together more than ever. For example, power companies use IoT-enabled sensors to monitor equipment remotely, while water treatment facilities rely on automated systems for real-time management.
However, the convergence of IT and OT has created pathways that cybercriminals can leverage to access critical systems. Traditional IT networks are often connected to OT systems without sufficient segmentation, making it easier for attackers to move between networks if they gain access.
State-Sponsored Attacks and Cybercrime
Critical infrastructure has become a target for sophisticated adversaries, including state-sponsored actors. These well-resourced attackers aim to cause widespread disruption, often to achieve political objectives. For instance, the cyberattack on Ukraine’s power grid in 2015, which resulted in significant outages, demonstrated how state-sponsored actors could weaponize cyber tactics to disrupt essential services.
Additionally, ransomware attacks have surged, targeting critical infrastructure with a “pay or suffer” strategy. Attackers know that sectors like healthcare, energy, and water can’t afford prolonged disruptions, making them more likely to pay large ransoms to restore operations quickly.
Why Critical Infrastructure is Especially Vulnerable
The vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure are compounded by several unique factors:
Expanding Attack Surface: The connectivity of OT and IT systems creates new entry points for attackers.
Legacy Systems: Many infrastructure facilities rely on outdated systems that are difficult to update or replace.
Resource Constraints: Some critical infrastructure organizations, especially smaller ones, lack the resources to implement advanced cybersecurity measures or hire specialized staff.
Supply Chain Risks: The global supply chain introduces risks, as infrastructure providers may unknowingly use compromised or counterfeit equipment that contains backdoors for adversaries.
Protecting Critical Infrastructure Against Emerging Threats
While the evolving threat landscape poses new challenges, there are actions that organizations can take to build resilience:
Segment IT and OT Networks: Proper segmentation helps limit the spread of an attack across interconnected systems.
Enhance Threat Detection: Employ advanced threat detection and monitoring systems, particularly in OT environments where visibility is often limited.
Regularly Update Systems and Protocols: While challenging, updating legacy systems and ensuring they adhere to security protocols can reduce vulnerabilities.
Prepare with Incident Response Plans: Proactively establish and regularly test incident response plans to respond quickly and effectively to cyber incidents.
Bottom Line
The integration of IT and OT systems in critical infrastructure has expanded the attack surface, making these essential systems increasingly vulnerable to cyberattacks. Industry 4.0 technologies and state-sponsored threats further complicate the landscape, as adversaries target legacy systems, exploit resource constraints, and leverage supply chain risks. Organizations must prioritize network segmentation, enhance threat detection, update legacy systems where feasible, and establish robust incident response plans. Proactive measures are essential to defend against emerging threats and safeguard critical infrastructure from devastating disruptions.
Learn More About the Threat Landscape
For a deeper dive into this topic, I invite you to watch our video, “Securing Our Future: Defending Critical Infrastructure Against Cyberattacks,” available here. In this presentation, I explore the threat landscape, share real-world case studies, and offer best practices for defending critical infrastructure. By watching, you can also earn Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credits—an excellent way to keep your skills current while learning about critical infrastructure security.
Stay tuned for our next post, where we’ll discuss common challenges faced by critical infrastructure organizations in defending against cyber threats and how you can help overcome them.
How Natsar Can Help
Natsar partners with organizations worldwide to assess and mitigate risk, strengthen cybersecurity strategies, develop and test incident response plans, and train teams at all levels—from staff to executives—in cybersecurity and risk management. Contact us today to explore how we can support your organization’s resilience and security goals.



This is an insightful breakdown of the evolving cyber threats facing critical infrastructure. I appreciate the way you’ve highlighted the interplay between IT and OT systems and the unique vulnerabilities they introduce. Given the global nature of supply chain risks, what are some specific strategies or tools you’d recommend to mitigate vulnerabilities introduced by compromised or counterfeit equipment?